Supreme court rules gay marriage is a nationwide right wsj

The Supreme Court ruled same-sex partners have a constitutional right to marry, sweeping away state bans on gay unions and extending marriage equality nationwide. The Supreme Court on Friday overturned the last remaining bans on gay marriage in the United States, ruling that same-sex couples have a constitutional right to marry. Supreme Court Rules Gay Marriage Is a Nationwide Right Attacks on Three Continents Revive Security Fears Thousands Mourn Pastor Slain in Charleston Shootings Video: Gay Marriage Ruling Ends U.S.

The new nationwide right to same-sex marriage resounded across the country Sunday, with the Supreme Court ruling fueling joyous gay-pride celebrations and denunciations from some pulpits, but also. WASHINGTON (AP) — Same-sex couples won the right to marry nationwide Friday as a divided Supreme Court handed a crowning victory to the gay rights movement, setting off a jubilant cascade of long-delayed weddings in states where they had been forbidden.

Same-sex ruling was no surprise to Supreme Court gamblers — and shouldn’t be to you either

The Supreme Court decision on same-sex marriage was much easier to predict. Circuit Court of Appeals, based in Cincinnati, upheld laws banning marriage for gay couples in Kentucky, Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee. To answer these questions, we should pause to ask a different one. Sections U. Search Search. While a near-majority of Republicans still oppose same-sex marriage today, opposition has declined sharply in the past six years as well.

Search Search. After Tuesday's arguments, same-sex marriage advocates descended the Supreme Court building's steps to the cheers of supporters. The Obama administration wants the court to find the state bans unconstitutional.

IE 11 is not supported. Edition: Europe. While lawyers spent the morning answering questions from the justices, raucous crowds of demonstrators, most advocating gay marriage rights, gathered outside the Supreme Court building, waving flags, cheering, chanting and giving speeches. Inthat figure was 70 percent. To some they were, but not to those who are well-versed in the ways of the court. The second is whether the 14th Amendment requires a state to recognize a marriage between two people of the same sex when their marriage was lawfully licensed and performed out of state.

But the jump has been striking both for constituencies who are traditionally more socially liberal — like young people and Democrats — and among more conservative groups, including seniors. But we're very grateful to be here," she said. In most of those cases, the outcomes were determined by judges, not by legislatures or voters. What do these landmark decisions tell us about the way the Supreme Court might rule in the months and years ahead?

This easily explains the Bush v Gore decision inwhich overturned the Florida Supreme Court and authorized the termination of the recount, handing the election to George W Bush by five Bush supporters, four Gore supporters. NBC News Logo. Sign In Create your free profile. Breyer asked whether the nation needed more time to determine whether gay marriage was harmful to society.

The justices set aside two and a half hours Tuesday to ask lawyers on supreme court rules gay marriage is a nationwide right wsj sides two central questions. In a court that is currently weighted to the conservative side of the argument, however, victories are to be savored by liberals, but certainly not to be expected. Follow NBC News.

Any new wave of liberalism at the Supreme Court would first require a new wave of justices, and for the moment, at least, that does not look likely to be happening any time soon.